I've Received the Lighthouse Award!

Erika M Szabo nominated me for The Lighthouse Award

for helping to edit the Read for Animals book. 

Here is her nomination:

http://readforanimals.blogspot.com/2014/03/im-honored-to-be-nominated-for.html
Thanks you, Erika!  I certainly appreciate it!

The Lighthouse Award requires that a blogger:

• Display the Award Certificate on your blog.
• Write a post and link back to the blogger that nominated you.
• Inform your nominees of their award nominations.
• Share three ways that you like to help others.
• Nominate as many bloggers as you like.

I honestly don't spend a lot of time helping others at this point of my life, but I did spend fourteen years taking care of elderly family members.  I contribute to a number of charitable organizations.  I also am happy to help promote indie authors.  I was happy to show my support of animal welfare by helping in the production of Read for Animals.  You can buy it at Amazon -- only $3.95 for the Kindle version.  If you prefer paperbacks, a version with black-and-white illustrations has now been published for only $8.65.  All proceeds will go to help animal shelters. 

I've only picked one blog to nominate for this award:
Jeanne E. Rogers:  Australian Fantasy Adventures http://warriorechidna.blogspot.com
Jeanne is one of the contributors to Read for Animals.  She writes about endangered animals with an eye to educating children (and adults) about their plight.  She is particularly interested in Australian animals and writes children's fantasy stories with foxes and marsupials as the heroes and evil thylacines and dragon lizards as the villains. See The Sword of Demelza on Amazon.  The illustrations are great, by the way.  Here is the cover.  The valiant steed is obviously a wombat.  Anyone who followed Steve Irwin (also, no longer with us) knows that they seem slow and cuddly, but they can be quite feisty and aggressive when aggravated!

 

Ye Olde Grammarian (No.5): More Pesky Punctuation

      


http://pentopapercommunications.com/2011/10/31/comma-conundrumsthe-dos-and-donts-of-commas/

       I've been doing some copyediting lately, and that means I have punctuation on the brain.  So allow me to disemburden (is that a word?) myself.

 

       First let me list links to my earlier Olde Grammarian posts, in case any of you are eager to suffer more agony:

Ye Olde Grammarian [No.1]: I discuss the value of diagramming sentences and also dangling participial and prepositional phrases.

Ye Olde Grammarian (No.2):  I discuss that common bugaboo, the incorrect use of pronoun cases. Grrr! One of my pet peeves!

Ye Olde Grammarian (No. 3): Pesky Punctuation Problems: I discussed the placement of periods, commas, etc., in relation to quotation marks and parentheses.

Ye Olde Grammarian is Ba-a-ck (No.4): a humorous post where I ended up on the subject of the Oxford comma.

 

       Allow me to first review the rules for punctuating dialogue since these may be unfamiliar especially to those whose first language is not English (other language have totally different conventions in the matter of punctuation).

       Any statement or question or exclamation uttered by a character must be enclosed in quotation marks.  "I saw the murderer come through the door."  "Did the murderer come through the door?" "Wow, the murderer made a quick getaway!"  The end mark on the sentence always goes inside the quotation mark.

       But what if you want to say who said those things?

       "I saw the murderer come through the door," John said. (Note that a comma ends the bit of dialogue because the whole shebang is one sentence.  It doesn't make sense to write "I saw the murderer come through the door."  John said.  John said is not a separate or complete sentence.)

       Ditto for

       John said, "I saw the murderer come through the door."  Do not write: John said.  "I saw him come through the door."

       In the case of questions marks or exclamation points, they stand in place of the comma, inside the quotation mark:

       "Did the murderer come through the door?" John said.

       John said, "Did he come through the door?"

       So what if you want to split up the quotation?

       "I saw the murderer run through the door," said John.  "I don't know where he went after that."  (Note the normal comma before said John.  A period follows because it ends a complete sentence.  Then a new sentence begins, so it's simply enclosed in quotation marks.)

       "I saw the murderer run through the door," said John, "and jump into his car."  Here you decided to divide the sentence, inserting said John in the middle.  It becomes a kind of appositive (more on that in a minute), so it gets set off with commas.  Since the sentence isn't complete, the second part begins with a lower-case letter.  Never write: "I saw the murderer run through the door," said John.  "and jump into his car."  Also never write: "I saw him run through the door," said John.  "And jump into his car."  Ditto, never write: "I saw him run through the door," said John.  "and jump into his car." 

       What if you are using he said instead of John said?  Correct examples:

       "John came through the door," he said. (Note the lower case h, because it's not a proper name.)

       "John came through the door," he said, "and jumped into his car."

       "John came through the door," he said.  "Then he jumped into his car."

 

       Okay, now the appositive, that vague term.  Appositives - useful constructs - need some definition.  (Can you identify two appositives in the two preceding sentences?)  Here is how Grammar Monster defines the term:  

       "An appositive is a noun, a noun phrase, or a noun clause which sits next to another noun to rename it or to describe it in another way. (The word appositive comes from the Latin for to put near.)  Appositives are usually offset with commas, brackets, or dashes."

       I honestly don't know if he said in quoted speech should be called an appositive, but it certainly has the characteristics of one. 

       A common use of the appositive is the placement of a name to define the previous word or phrase.  These are often mispunctuated.

       My dog, Ollie, will chew your shoes if he gets a chance.

       My best friend, Mary, can't come to the party.

       Personally, I have no objection to seeing the commas omitted in those cases.  It seems a little confusing.  Now if you're addressing somebody, then yes, put commas.  You might think you were addressing Mary here until you read the rest of the sentence.

       I would prefer to say: Mary, my best friend, can't come to the party.  (My best friend is the appositive here and clearly needs to be set off with commas.)

      

      Another error of comma use related to this is in punctuating salutations and greetings.  I continue to be old school and do it the way I was taught, even though it seems to have been universally abandoned these days.  I will continue to address you in emails as

       Hi, John, (not as Hi John)

       However, I will not do this if your name is Mary.  Then I will write

       Hi, Mary,

      The use of the vocative (i.e., an instance where you are addressing someone) is related to this.  A terrific example of this appears in the picture at the top of this post.  And here is another (adapted from this website) as to why you should set off the name of the person addressed with a comma:

       What don't you want to tell John?
       What don't you want to tell, John?

 

       And I believe that's quite enough for now, although I haven't run out of topics! 

       And I want to apologize to John, whoever and wherever you are.  You are a sterling fellow and certainly not a murderer, and I have absolutely no wish to defame your character!