Sunday, November 24, 2013
I'm in the process of revising The Man Who Found Birds among the Stars (yes, I'm actually thinking about publishing it, long as it is). There was one scene I wanted to change. It's an important and dramatic scene where we learn why a particular character acted as he did, producing disastrous consequences. I have a friend who read all my books as I was writing them and she presented the opinion that the motivation in this scene was too old-fashioned -- that is, too old-fashioned for 21st- century sensibilities, to say nothing of the 28th century. I do want this scene to seem urgent and believable, so I decided to adjust some of the elements to make what had happened more seriously horrendous.
Does that make sense? I can't tell you the details -- they shouldn't be revealed until you read the book.
I ought to say parenthetically that when I decide to start preparing a story for publication, especially when I plan to divide it into volumes, I never work with my original construction. I make a copy and divide into what I call Master Copies of the final forms, and then revise those. Therefore, I still have the original piece for reference, with all the annotations, dates inserted, etc.
So yesterday I rewrote the scene in question, changing certain aspects. And it came out all disorganized -- the plot points are more terrible and destructive, but the focus was diverted from the person who has to be seen as the guilty party. It becomes more complicated -- the blame is not clear-cut. Frankly, it just didn't work in my opinion. Didn't feel right.
This morning I took out the rewritten part, placed it in a document where I keep deleted segments (just in case), then copied the original from the basic manuscript and stuck it back in. Then I started over. I kept the same storyline but I beefed up some of the motivations and character aspects. What happened may seem old-fashioned, but still, given the characters as they are presented, it makes a stronger and more striking case than my revision did.
Just call me Jethro Gibbs. My gut told me the old way was right in spite of my friend's opinion. Sometimes you have to go with your gut and stick with what you wrote in the beginning.
What problems do the rest of you have with rewriting? Do you listen to what your gut tells you is right, or is it all intellectual analysis?
Monday, November 4, 2013
Volume Three (The Valley of Thorns) of The Labors of Ki'shto'ba Huge-Head has been successfully published on Amazon, both paperback and Kindle, and on Smashwords! The Smashwords went easier than it ever has (unless they find something to quibble about in considering it for the Premium Catalog). You can download a 25% sample on Smashwords, which will include the preliminary material and approximately four chapters. Amazon hasn't linked up the paperback and the Kindle yet, but ultimately you will be able to get a Kindle version FREE if you buy a paperback.
I'm having an Anniversary Party as a Facebook event on November 15. Two years ago I published my first book, Monster Is in the Eye of the Beholder, on that date. Now I have six books published, plus the little free novelette on Smashwords, "The Blessing of Krozem." All my Facebook Friends are invited. If you're not my friend yet but are on Facebook, go in and friend me, and I'll invite you.
Why would you want to come to my party?
Witty conversation, free virtual food,
information about my books,
maybe a surprise reveal of the unfinished
cover for v.4: Beneath the Mountain of Heavy Fear
Plus, I'm going to have special prices on all my books,
as well as a drawing for a couple of paperbacks
from the names of the people who attend.
and check it out!